{"id":10058,"date":"2022-01-03T12:30:00","date_gmt":"2022-01-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.arch.tamu.edu\/?p=10058"},"modified":"2022-06-15T11:51:00","modified_gmt":"2022-06-15T16:51:00","slug":"why-public-art-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pvfa.tamu.edu\/news\/2022\/01\/03\/why-public-art-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Public Art Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Public art, and its detractors, go hand in hand. An online search quickly reveals results like:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhy Public Art is So Consistently Awful,\u201d \u201cWhat is the Point of Public Art if the Public Does Not Like It,\u201d and others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
These aren\u2019t new complaints, said Susanneh Bieber, an award-winning art and architectural historian in the Texas A&M departments of visualization and architecture whose research focuses on American artists of the 1960s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That era\u2019s artists were well aware that many view art as frivolous and elitist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Art for Change<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bieber, who is writing a book about \u201860s art, said many of the era\u2019s artists engaged with the built environment because they wanted to make their art more relevant to the general public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Their effort worked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Although plenty of public art naysayers remain, as reflected in those search results,\u201860s artists were indeed able to significantly elevate public art\u2019s relevance to the general public. They did something important \u2014 their art helped change how American society looks at \u201cbig picture\u201d matters such as the Vietnam War. They showed that art can inspire a society to question the status quo and to critically reevaluate historical events from different perspectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bieber\u2019s research also reveals female artists\u2019 previously unsung contributions as well as their struggles with art world sexism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A New Way to Look at Sculpture<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In the \u201860s, artists such as Claes Oldenburg began to reimagine the monument, a staple of public art for centuries. Monuments traditionally celebrate war victories or heroism in a vertical orientation \u2014 a man on a horse on a pedestal is a typical case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Oldenburg had different ideas about monuments. He reimagined well-known structures such as the Washington Monument, for example, in a drawing of a giant pair of scissors pointed skyward. \u201cDesigns like these, which he never intended to be built, have a light-hearted touch but seriously rethink what a monument could be,\u201d said Bieber. \u201cHe\u2019s questioning society\u2019s framework of what a monument is honoring, for whom and for what purposes it was built.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n